Pro-life or Pro-choice Question?
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007I have been reading a lot lately about both positions and have found it amazing that neither side really promotes the choices a woman has in their argument. The only aspect of the argument that comes out clear is the creation of fear of the other opinion winning. The two groups seem to have lost their way and are no longer supporting the woman but supporting a cause.
Does the right to choose mean that a woman has the option to:
- Give birth and give the child up for adoption.
- Be supported by a family expecting to adopt their baby
- Have the child and know there are the supports she needs
- Have the child and not know there are supports she needs
- Have the child and know the hardships she and her baby will have with no supports
- Have a medical procedure that removes the fetus
- Take a pill and the fetus detaches
A huge resource being ignored by both factions is that there are thousands of families ready to step forward to be an alternative for the woman and her infant to be. That includes support to women today, while she is carrying the infant and in most cases medical care the families will pay for. Many families are even having open adoptions so that the birth mother can choose to be part of the child’s life if they so chose. Everywhere infants are wanted by families to bring into their loving homes.
Pro-choice does not mandate an abortion
Pro-life does not mandate parenthood
Stop the arguing and educate individuals about all of their choices.
Both groups should be affiliated with adoption agencies. Just say yes and families will come.
I close with one other note: Child abuse and neglect in the US is rampant and many children are in need of a family. Raising a child takes a community not just one person. Therefore, organizations should be willing to support the woman and her infant and in some cases their other older children.











